<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Llama and Lamb :: Personal blog of Rachel and Stephen &#187; voting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.llamaandlamb.com/archives/tag/voting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.llamaandlamb.com</link>
	<description>The personal blog of Rachel Steely and Stephen James</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:40:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>On The Issues: Trying to get past the political rhetoric</title>
		<link>http://www.llamaandlamb.com/archives/on-the-issues-trying-to-get-past-the-political-rhetoric/</link>
		<comments>http://www.llamaandlamb.com/archives/on-the-issues-trying-to-get-past-the-political-rhetoric/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political_campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political_debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political_rhetoric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smjdesign.com/rachelandstephen/archives/on-the-issues-trying-to-get-past-the-political-rhetoric/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As of January 2008, the most open field for presidential candidates in many, many years&#8211;especially on the Republican side. So you have been browsing around YouTube watching presidential candidates debate? A few years ago, I never thought I would get &#8220;news&#8221; through YouTube. Of course, I&#8217;m hesitant to call political debates news. News it seems [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of January 2008, the most open field for presidential candidates in many, many years&#8211;especially on the Republican side. So you have been browsing around <a href="http://www.youtube.com/youchoose">YouTube</a> watching <a href="http://www.youtube.com/youchoose">presidential candidates debate</a>? A few years ago, I never thought I would get &#8220;news&#8221; through YouTube. Of course, I&#8217;m hesitant to call political debates news. News it seems should be more objective/factual and less about charisma and being well-spoken&#8211;not that people in charge of &#8220;nu-clu-er&#8221; weapons shouldn&#8217;t be well-spoken.</p>
<p>So if you are trying to past the he said/she said (hey, I can actually say that now) and base your vote on consistency (what politicians were saying and voting for before they were running&#8211;yes, I know some of you may say that some candidates were always planning on running this year), I recommend issue oriented websites. One of my favorites is <a href="http://www.issues2000.org/default.htm">OnTheIssues.org</a>. It&#8217;s been around since 2000. Actually, coverage of the 2000 election and a large amount of information on the 2004 election is still on the site. The conclusions and scale/chart at the bottom is a little over the top as if a vote on one issue makes one +/- 3 points on a scale.</p>
<p>Do you have a better political issue comparison web site to recommend? How do you get around the political rhetoric without letting the candidates or interest groups influence you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.llamaandlamb.com/archives/on-the-issues-trying-to-get-past-the-political-rhetoric/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
